Exchange Server Forums

"Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed"

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2003] >> Message Routing >> "Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed"

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Limited time MSExchange.org offer! -- 1.Sep.2008 1:00:00 PM

TechGenix and SolarWinds have partnered to provide free copies of SolarWinds Exchange Monitor to all visitors who join the MSExchange.org Forums. SolarWinds Exchange Monitor is a handy desktop dashboard that continuously monitors Microsoft Exchange to deliver real-time insight into Exchange services, mail queue sizes, and host server health. Learn more about Exchange Monitor and the free offer!

"Delivery to the following recipients has been del... - 16.Jul.2008 3:20:17 AM

anaboka

Posts: 5
Joined: 14.Jul.2008
Status: offline

Greetings Everybody,

One of our customers said that a few emails sent to our employeeA and some other employees of ours resulted in the reply below. Has anybody every experienced this type of an issue? What can be causing this? Thank you!!!

From: postmaster@ourdomain.com
[mailto:postmaster@ourdomain.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 1:04 AM
To: customer@hisdomain.com
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Delay)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY.

YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE.

Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed.

employeeA@ourdomain.com

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: "Delivery to the following recipients has been... - 16.Jul.2008 4:08:04 AM

vsin11

Posts: 168
Joined: 2.Apr.2007
Status: offline

This has something to on the Sender's end. Probably these mails that they are sending to your user is sitting in their queues.
If its the problem sending to your domain only... problem could be their mail server is not able to resolve DNS of your domain.

_____________________________

Vinay Pal Singh
http://smarthost.blogspot.com

(in reply to anaboka)

Post #: 2