Exchange Server Forums
Forums |
Register |
Login |
My Profile |
Inbox |
RSS
|
My Subscription |
My Forums |
Address Book |
Member List |
Search |
FAQ |
Ticket List |
Log Out
Ignoring AD Sites
|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
Login | |
|
Limited time MSExchange.org offer! -- 1.Sep.2008 1:00:00 PM
|
|
TechGenix and SolarWinds have partnered to provide free copies of SolarWinds Exchange Monitor to all visitors who join the MSExchange.org Forums. SolarWinds Exchange Monitor is a handy desktop dashboard that continuously monitors Microsoft Exchange to deliver real-time insight into Exchange services, mail queue sizes, and host server health. Learn more about Exchange Monitor and the free offer!
|
Ignoring AD Sites - 12.Mar.2007 7:09:15 AM
|
|
|
AlanDutton
Posts: 1
Joined: 12.Mar.2007
Status: offline
|
Hi All, We're currently rolling out an E2K7 environment. Single Domain, Two Sites. We've got a mailbox role in each Site, and a Hub Transport in each site. Our problem is, that if a Hub Server goes down, mail flow stops. We could just add another Hub Server in each Site, but I think this is a bit of an overkill. My questions: 1) Is there anyway of getting the Exchange 2007 Mailbox Server to ignore the site link when the local Hub Transporter is down and go "out of site"?. 2) If we have to add the Hub Transport role to the Mailbox Server role, is there anyway of prioritizing which Hub Transport Server will be used. 3) What happens if our Client Access Server is in a 3rd Site? Thanks for reading, Alan
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|