Exchange Server Forums
Forums |
Register |
Login |
My Profile |
Inbox |
RSS
|
My Subscription |
My Forums |
Address Book |
Member List |
Search |
FAQ |
Ticket List |
Log Out
Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracking or Inbox
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
Logged in as: Guest
|
Login | |
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 6.May2008 9:10:34 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
The message shows up in the SMTP logs of your bridgehead server, but not in the Message Tracking logs for that same server? What does the SMTP logs show for the bridgehead and mailbox servers? Are all SMTP commands received and acknowledged with OK (200-299 responses)? Did you check the queues on all servers?
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 6.May2008 10:36:43 AM
|
|
|
Jesper Bernle
Posts: 912
Joined: 15.Oct.2007
Status: offline
|
Correct me if I´m wrong, but I´m under the impression that the commands logged in the SMTP log isn´t sequential thus making it hard to tell where the communication started and ended. Otherwize it´s correct that I can see the mail in the SMTP logs of all Exchange Servers along the Message path ... but not in Message Tracking Center. And yes - all queues are checked.
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 6.May2008 12:05:36 PM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
Just to confirm, Message Tracking is enabled for each of the servers? I've not witnessed an SMTP log being out of order. What are you seeing that is out of order? Is it that message streams are co-mingled, or that they are out of chronological order?
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 7.May2008 4:17:44 AM
|
|
|
Jesper Bernle
Posts: 912
Joined: 15.Oct.2007
Status: offline
|
Hi Dean! Yes, Message Tracking is enabled Organizational Wide via Policy. This is what I find in the SMTP log: 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "EHLO -? srv00abc.xx.yy.com SMTP" 250 314 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "x-exps -? GSSAPI SMTP" 0 22 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "x-link2state -? LAST CHUNK={0000006a} MULTI (5) ({00000051} DIGEST_QUERY caaf3d7bd7711148b8d4e8ab73e9f0eb ca4849932a6ec95dba77b26b132c6257 ) SMTP" 200 68 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "MAIL -? FROM:<sender@domain.se> SMTP" 250 51 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "RCPT -? TO:<recipient@domain.se> SMTP" 250 38 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "xexch50 -? 1084 2 SMTP" 354 22 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "BDAT -? <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAGoAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgAKypWwgAARU1TTURCLkRMTAAAAAAAAAAAG1X6IKpmEc2byACqAC/EWgwAAABTUlYwMDU1NQAvTz1TSVBPTi9PVT1TMDEvY249UmVjaXBpZW50cy9jbj1sbmYALgAAAAAAAAC1PEFTQI/OQb6+vk12Q7sDAQDByoxSW2/tSKljxWR2JvYGAAAAE75LAAAAAAAALgAAAAAAAAC1PEFTQI/OQb6+vk12Q7sDAQDByoxSW2/tSKljxWR2JvYGAAAAE75MAAAQAAAAYLTzatTiFEu5WVat5ztaVQ0AAABTVjogRvZyIGluZm8A@domain.se> SMTP" 250 404 10.111.122.36 - srv00abc.xx.yy.com [07/Apr/2008:10:58:09 +0100] "QUIT -?srv00abc.xx.yy.com SMTP" 240 70
< Message edited by Jesper Bernle -- 7.May2008 4:20:04 AM >
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 7.May2008 9:30:37 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
What is that log excerpt showing? Is it the inbound message from the outside, or internally between the bridgehead and mailbox server (and is it the log on the bridgehead or mailbox server)? It appears to be accepting the message.
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 8.May2008 9:11:10 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
Does the message appear in MTC for the bridgehead server? If so, what does that indicate?
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 8.May2008 9:34:09 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
You are getting current information in the MTC logs though, right? Let's think about what else can affect message traffic. Do you have any event sinks anywhere? What Anti-Virus and/or Anti-Spam software do you have installed on your Exchange servers? Have you attempted to disable those? Have you activated any of the Exchange filters? Is it possible that the one message was corrupted, or that the transmission was garbled? Since ESMTP commands were issued (in particular the BDAT command), Exchange just counts characters instead of looking for the normal end-of-data sequence (CRLF, dot, CRLF).
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 8.May2008 10:32:49 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
quote:
I´m not really sure what you are implying with "Since ESMTP commands were issued (in particular the BDAT command), ... " Could you try to elaborate a bit more? Ha - I knew I'd have to explain that one ... In a normal SMTP transmission, the body of the message is controlled by issuing a DATA command. Trouble is, how do you tell the recipient server when you're done transmitting? The RFC specification says that you issue a period on a line by itself - in other words a newline, a dot, and another newline. That signals the recipient server to prompt for the next SMTP command - typically QUIT. You can guess that it a garbled transmission at the wrong time, or a malformed message termination would result in either a premature end, or not getting the termination transmitted at all. In ESMTP, transmission control is done using a BDAT command. This indicates the length of the message in bytes. When the number of bytes has been reached, the recipient server can assume the message is complete. I don't know the actual format of the BDAT command (which appears in your SMTP log), so I don't know if what you show is normal or not. You might look for another one to compare. The point of my bringing it up was that it doesn't take a lot to corrupt a message. SMTP is a TCP connection (TCP port 25), and therefore some additional things are done behind the scenes to guarantee the connection, but that doesn't mean that problems can't occur.
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 8.May2008 10:56:37 AM
|
|
|
uemurad
Posts: 8232
Joined: 7.Jan.2004
From: California, USA
Status: offline
|
quote:
But is it fair to say that SMTP messages can from time to time be corrupted even though the session is completed (thus not making TCP resending the last packet) and that the net result of this is lost email even though it´s presieved as received by Exchange (at least looking at the SMTP log)? It's rare. I was just throwing out the possibility especially in light of your note that messages belonging to the same thread before and after came through without any issue. quote:
I love learning new stuff about Exchange Same here. I have to say I've learned a ton of stuff by participating here at MSExchange.org, researching issues that other people are experiencing.
_____________________________
Regards, Dean T. Uemura Microsoft MVP - Exchange (2007-2011) exchangeguy.blogspot.com uemurad@yahoo.com
|
|
|
RE: Message shows up in SMTP log but not Message Tracki... - 8.Jun.2017 12:06:40 AM
|
|
|
Buisness_Idea
Posts: 70
Joined: 19.Apr.2017
Status: offline
|
Tight bras can impact or hinder the lymphatic flow. It is therefore very important to pay attention to what you wear and to prevent breast cancer you must wear those that they call breast cancer clothing. online sports bra sale
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|