Exchange Server Forums

Public Folder Auto Reply From address - loop prevention

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2003] >> Public Folders >> Public Folder Auto Reply From address - loop prevention

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Limited time MSExchange.org offer! -- 1.Sep.2008 1:00:00 PM

TechGenix and SolarWinds have partnered to provide free copies of SolarWinds Exchange Monitor to all visitors who join the MSExchange.org Forums. SolarWinds Exchange Monitor is a handy desktop dashboard that continuously monitors Microsoft Exchange to deliver real-time insight into Exchange services, mail queue sizes, and host server health. Learn more about Exchange Monitor and the free offer!

Public Folder Auto Reply From address - loop prevention - 1.May2008 6:14:52 PM

papapeter

Posts: 1
Joined: 1.May2008
Status: offline

I am running Exchange 2003 SP2 and have an auto-reply set up on a public folder using the Folder Assistant. It works fine except for the occasional loops which require that I quickly throw in a delete rule based on the subject line. I would like to expand this to other mail enabled public folders but do not want to do the constant administration of adding delete rules to multiple folders. It seems that easiest solution would be to change the from address on the template to be a no-reply@ address except that I cannot figure out any way to give a public folder "send as" permissions on a no-reply user account or distro list. Does anyone have a way to do this or send-as a different address from a public folder.

Thanks
Peter Milford

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: Public Folder Auto Reply From address - loop preven... - 4.Jun.2008 12:31:10 PM

dwynne

Posts: 53
Joined: 10.Apr.2008
Status: offline

If you have the resources you ay want to look at Exclaimer Mail utilities. I have a few mail enabled public folders that I setup auto-replies for using the auto-respond feature of Exclaimer. That is all I use it for.

(in reply to papapeter)

Post #: 2