Exchange Server Forums

Webmail only

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2000] >> Outlook Web Access >> Webmail only

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Limited time MSExchange.org offer! -- 1.Sep.2008 1:00:00 PM

TechGenix and SolarWinds have partnered to provide free copies of SolarWinds Exchange Monitor to all visitors who join the MSExchange.org Forums. SolarWinds Exchange Monitor is a handy desktop dashboard that continuously monitors Microsoft Exchange to deliver real-time insight into Exchange services, mail queue sizes, and host server health. Learn more about Exchange Monitor and the free offer!

Webmail only - 22.Nov.2004 3:54:00 PM

doperwt

Posts: 5
Joined: 22.Nov.2004
From: NL
Status: offline

Hello,

I have a question about OWA.
I want to create a user that can logon only to OWA but cannot logon to any computer on the network.

Is this possible?
I hope someone can help me.

Regards
Doperwt

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: Webmail only - 22.Nov.2004 6:48:00 PM

rytmehans

Posts: 803
Joined: 10.Jul.2004
From: Denmark
Status: offline

Hi,

On the user account tab (in active directory users and computers) press the log on to button and select the OWA server only.

(in reply to doperwt)

Post #: 2

RE: Webmail only - 24.Nov.2004 3:59:00 PM

doperwt

Posts: 5
Joined: 22.Nov.2004
From: NL
Status: offline

Hello Leif,

Thank you for your reply and suggestion.

I tried that already, but it didn't work.
When I select the OWA server, there is only one server in the network, users cannot logon to OWA.
I get error: -2146893052 (0x80090304)

Did you try this in your network?
Maybe I do something else wrong.

Regards
Doperwt

[ November 26, 2004, 07:05 PM: Message edited by: doperwt ]

(in reply to doperwt)

Post #: 3

RE: Webmail only - 8.Jul.2005 2:32:00 PM

Guest

Do you have the users restricted to logon to specific machines only? If so, allow them to logon to all machines and see if that solves the problem. It worked for me.

(in reply to doperwt)

Post #: 4