tlor
Posts: 12
Joined: 13.Sep.2001
Status: offline
|
whats the deal? i just want to have people on laptops get their mail from home. i have a vpn working, but its *oh-so-slow*, especially starting outlook. whereas direct imap is fast even over dialup. what works real good is netscape mail, setup for imap and ldap for the address book, but that's still using a seperate program. why cant you just download pop3 mail into an offline store without duplicates? -all they want remotely is mail. why the hell couldn't they just have outlook connect over a single tcp port and negotiate another for its data like everything else. like, what is the party line here? what does microsoft say to do? setup a vpn? install a web server? open a bunch of ports to the internet for rpc ds is and such then put hosts/lmhosts entries, split dns zones or install wins? well why the hell does it need netbios even? i read everyone suggesting owa here. this is, in other mailsystems, a usefull frill. is this really the only useful way to let people get mail from home? why must i wrangle with the setup proclivities and crap throughput and extra user instructions of a vpn just to get email? Its nice and fast with a local pst file and imap, but they need the shared calanders/addresses and stuff while in the office. i mean, the vpn works, its just stupidly slow. like it takes about 3 minutes just to open outlook, then 5-20 sec for each message you click. ok, most of this post is completely off topic, but i feel like i'm in a vacuum here. what does everybody else do? i feel as though i am missing the simple answer. any thoughts?
|