Exchange Server Forums

Windows or Exchange???

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2003] >> Installation >> Windows or Exchange???

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Limited time MSExchange.org offer! -- 1.Sep.2008 1:00:00 PM

TechGenix and SolarWinds have partnered to provide free copies of SolarWinds Exchange Monitor to all visitors who join the MSExchange.org Forums. SolarWinds Exchange Monitor is a handy desktop dashboard that continuously monitors Microsoft Exchange to deliver real-time insight into Exchange services, mail queue sizes, and host server health. Learn more about Exchange Monitor and the free offer!

Windows or Exchange??? - 11.Mar.2005 1:45:00 PM

EdwardLHall

Posts: 43
Joined: 8.Mar.2005
From: USA
Status: offline

Ok, this is a good one.

2003 DC, GC, DNS, & WINS

NetDiag & DCDiag pass all tests

Always get the following errors on boot:

1. Kerberos [537] An error occurred during login.
2. UserENV [1097] Windows cannot find the machine account, the local security authority cannot be contacted.

According to Microsoft these errors are normal and should be ignored.

THEN we installed Exchange Server 2003. Now we get the first two errors followed by these,

1. SA fails to start [No log error]
2. IS fails to start [Dependency on SA]
3. MTA fails to start [Depenency on SA]
4. Event fail to start [Dependency on IS]
5. MSADC [8026] LDAP bind was unsuccessful - Server down.

After boot we can manually start all of these services.

Any Ideas?

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: Windows or Exchange??? - 11.Mar.2005 4:30:00 PM

EdwardLHall

Posts: 43
Joined: 8.Mar.2005
From: USA
Status: offline

Never mind, we found the problem.

There was a second network adapter in the server that was not being used so we had disabled it in device manager.

Apparently this was causing a delay in starting either the Kerberos or Netlogon service.

After we enabled the extra adapter and fed it a bogus IP address all of the other problems resolved.

(in reply to EdwardLHall)

Post #: 2