• Twitter
  • FaceBook

Exchange Server Forums

Forums | Register | Login | My Profile | Inbox | RSS RSS icon | My Subscription | My Forums | Address Book | Member List | Search | FAQ | Ticket List | Log Out

Aliases, Alternate Recipients, multiple SMTP addresses.

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 5.5] >> General >> Aliases, Alternate Recipients, multiple SMTP addresses. Page: [1]
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Aliases, Alternate Recipients, multiple SMTP addresses. - 23.Feb.2006 7:23:49 PM   


Posts: 9
Joined: 23.Feb.2006
Status: offline

I took over management of a 5.5/NT4 box for a small enterprize a few months ago.

My question is about aliasing and alternate recepients.

The orginization has several "catch-all" mail boxes (Suggestions@domain.com, HR@domain.com, Reservations@domain.com, Comments@domain.com, Etc.)

These boxes are set up 3 different ways.  I am wondering which is the best way.

Scenario1:  Box is created and assigned to a primary user, other users given access rights.  Each user adds the email account to their Outlook client. 

Scenario2:  Box is created and redirected to a single user by use of the Alternate Recipient feature on the Delivery Options tab.

Scenaro3:  No box is created.  Instead a 2nd SMTP address is added on the E-Mail Address tab. (IE: John Doe has both john@domain.com and hr@domain.com).

Now, I realize that when multiple users need to access the box,  Scenario1 is my only option.  But in the case of a single user accessing a 2nd email account which of the 2 options (Scenarios 2 & 3) is a better practice?

Personally, I would tend toward Scenaro3 because it reduces administration (no box is created) and also possibly reduces the required number of seat licenses.   I do realize that it would requrie some tracking since any 2nd SMTP address will not show up in the directory.

You feed back is appreciated.

Post #: 1
RE: Aliases, Alternate Recipients, multiple SMTP addres... - 24.Feb.2006 10:39:13 AM   


Posts: 1019
Joined: 25.Sep.2003
From: York, UK
Status: offline
It's all a matter of what best fits your needs.  Scenario 2 is functionally almost exactly the same as 3, but has an extra mailbox (empty!) kicking around.

Also, consider whether you ever need the user(s) to actually Send As the mailbox address - if so, then scenario 3 isn't helpful.

(in reply to bgcarter)
Post #: 2

Page:   [1] << Older Topic    Newer Topic >>
All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 5.5] >> General >> Aliases, Alternate Recipients, multiple SMTP addresses. Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts

Follow TechGenix on Twitter