|
cmorris05 -> RE: External DNS and SMTP server (23.Jan.2009 1:57:58 PM)
|
quote:
You say that if you allow the outbound messages to go directly out from the 2007 server, everything works. When you attempt to send them through the 2003 server, it fails to deliver to some domains. Im sorry if I did not communicate that correctly. There are two problems that I believe are related. The one thing that never changes is the 2003 server is always the SMTP server. One problem is that the way I have the FQDN of the SMTP server set on the 2003 server it seems to not be able to send mail to some domains. I believed this to be because the FQDN is configured as the name of the server and the FQDN set up at the registrar for global DNS is a different name. So, I changed the FQDN on the SMTP server to try to fix this problem, which creates a second problem, that users with mailboxes (all of them) on the 2007 server are not able to send through the SMTP server on the 2003 server. quote:
1. Are the 2007 and 2003 servers in the same Exchange organization? Yes quote:
2. Are the domains to which delivery fails always the same ones? I am not 100% sure about all of them, but I know two that does always fail mac.com and me.com which are both through apple. quote:
3. What does Message Tracking say about the failed deliveries? It depends on how it is set up, if the email can be sent from the 2007 server to the 2003 smtp server, then I get no error on 2007 but the email sits in the queue on the 2003 server. If I change the FQDN on the SMTP server as I described above I get the error: "451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with: "535 5.7.3 Anonymous authentication is not allowed." Attempted to failover to alternate host, but that did not succeed. Either there are no alternate hosts, or delivery failed to all alternate hosts." and the mail sits in the queue on the 2007 server. quote:
4. Have you attempted to test a telnet session from your 2007 server to your 2003 server pointing to a recipient address in one of the problem domains? No.. but I am not sure that is relevent since it is able to send when the FQDN is set to the name of the server.. I could very well be wrong though.
|
|
|
|