Exchange Server Forums

Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2007] >> Message Routing >> Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007 - 15.Apr.2009 4:22:28 PM

slj333

Posts: 2
Joined: 15.Apr.2009
Status: offline

Hello,
We have a new installation of Exchange 07. We are able to send and receive messages for 1 domain, but not able to receive message with a second domain that we have added. MX records are pointing to the correct spot. We have added the second domain to the Hub Transport as an accepted domain through the management console. We then created and applied the email address policy for the new domain. When testing externally using telnet, we can access the Exchange server, but when we try to send a telnet based message to an address at the NEW domain, we get a message that mailbox is undeliverable.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
SJ

Post #: 1

Featured Links*

RE: Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007 - 15.Apr.2009 6:09:28 PM

John Weber

Posts: 1236
Joined: 20.Apr.2005
From: Portland, Oregon
Status: offline

restart-service *transport

_____________________________

John Weber [Lync MVP] http://tsoorad.blogspot.com

(in reply to slj333)

Post #: 2

RE: Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007 - 16.Apr.2009 4:08:37 AM

gayas

Posts: 22
Joined: 28.Apr.2008
Status: offline

try to telnet your exchange hub server from other domain controller from where you are facing this issue.

< Message edited by gayas -- 16.Apr.2009 4:12:53 AM >

(in reply to John Weber)

Post #: 3

RE: Add a domain to receive messages on Exchange 2007 - 16.Apr.2009 9:51:33 AM

slj333

Posts: 2
Joined: 15.Apr.2009
Status: offline

That was it. Now I know that bouncing the Transport service is the first thing to try. Wish I had all that time back that I spent troubleshooting this : )

Thanks again!

(in reply to John Weber)

Post #: 4