• RSS
  • Twitter
  • FaceBook

Exchange Server Forums

Forums | Register | Login | My Profile | Inbox | RSS RSS icon | My Subscription | My Forums | Address Book | Member List | Search | FAQ | Ticket List | Log Out

Three physical site resiliency designs

Users viewing this topic: none

Logged in as: Guest
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2010] >> High Availability >> Three physical site resiliency designs Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Three physical site resiliency designs - 2.May2011 6:50:46 PM   
chris meehan

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 30.Sep.2005
Status: offline
Everything that I read about site resiliency and high availability seems to reference a maximum of two phyiscal sites using a MS best practice of two DAGs each containing four mailbox servers with file share witness for full resiliency as part of the design to sustain quorum in the event of a WAN link failure.

Has anyone attempted or came across any documentation / guides or something that states it is not supported when three phsyical sites geographically dispersed come into play?

Heres a scenario; two physical locations located on continent A using the two physical sites in an Active /Active  / two DAG / four server in each dag model. When introducing the third site that is on continent B, create yet another DAG with three servers two of which reside on continet B and a third on continent A, acting as a lagged database copy but also to provide quorum should the WAN link go down since continent B is providing mail services to users.

Hopefully that makes sense, if not I will clarify further.

Thanks in advance for any thoughts or links..

Chris

< Message edited by chris meehan -- 2.May2011 7:00:21 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Three physical site resiliency designs - 31.May2011 1:26:52 AM   
Nithin_KS2000

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 30.May2011
Status: offline
So the Continent As DAG is good with servers in SiteA(1) and Site A(2). The question is on Continent Bs DAG which is having two servers in Site B(1) and one server in Site A(1). This sounds good to me. Is the question on supportability or if the design sounds good ? What is the roundtrip latency between sites ?

(in reply to chris meehan)
Post #: 2

Page:   [1] << Older Topic    Newer Topic >>
All Forums >> [Microsoft Exchange 2010] >> High Availability >> Three physical site resiliency designs Page: [1]
Jump to:

New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Follow TechGenix on Twitter